top of page

HK Cannabis Law Newsletter – June 4, 2020

In today’s HK Cannabis Law Newsletter, a potential breakthrough in trademark protection for cannabis businesses, the 9th Circuit considers the constitutionality of Section 280E, the BCC looks to add enforcement staff, and more.

  • An Arkansas retailer obtained a preliminary injunction against an Arizona company attempting to use a similar name under state trademark law. See the attorney’s statement here.

  • An Oakland company hopes the 9th Circuit will overturn Section 280E.

  • The DEA was granted expanded surveillance abilities in wake of George Floyd protests, causing concern amongst the cannabis community.

  • The Justice Department blocked ‘essential’ cannabis workers from bankruptcy protections.

  • The pros and cons of CBD infused beverages.

  • Joe Biden’s opposition to cannabis legalization appears to be rooted in anecdotal evidence.

  • The BCC just asked for funding for more enforcement staff.

Recent Posts

See All

In today’s HK Cannabis Law Newsletter, we present articles regarding a class action in Humboldt County, an imminent wave of dispensary closures in California, Google relaxing its CBD advertising rules

In today’s HK Cannabis Law Newsletter, we present articles regarding the amount of federal excise taxes paid by cannabis companies in 2022, a controversial bill proposed in California’s state assembly

In today’s HK Cannabis Law Newsletter, we present articles regarding, California’s thriving illicit market, a “creative” approach to labor peace agreements, California’s response to government corrupt

  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Black Facebook Icon
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
bottom of page